| Author |
Message |
Jodi B
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Katherine
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: photomanipulation |
|
|
I know they're not overly exciting but I had a REALLY quick play around in photoshop the other day.. feel free to add some more
this first one I've called "Dancing with the stars"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Dug
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 4837
Location: Gippsland
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
I really like the concept of the second one very nice
I am not a fan of dancing with the tarts TV show so I am biased on the first shot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
belle2
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 189
Location: Newcastle
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:38 am Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
| Well done! Like Dug, I prefer the second one. It is gorgeous |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jodi B
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Katherine
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:02 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
here's a couple more.. I might be bias but I think they're a bit cute
the last is my favourite
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gggraph
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 2062
Location: In front of the Computer.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:23 am Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
Nicely done, Jodi - I particularly like the tree roots one.
A couple of suggestions:
Watch the lighting: to make the new object 'live' in the scene, it needs to be lit in roughly the same way as everything else. It will cast shadows on other objects, and may have shadows cast on it. (try the Dodge and Burn tools). This might sound anal, but in fact having the shadows consistent is a great way to sell the shot - it's like the brain goes "woa, that shadow is clearly in the background AND it goes across the fairy, so it MUST be real..."
Watch the quality: the new object needs to match the quality of the scene - if it's razor sharp in a soft shot it will stand out. (ditto for grain / noise). Try the Blur tool, or Gaussian blur for large areas.
Cheers
Grant |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Pook
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 2904
Location: Tasmania
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:17 am Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
What Dug and Grant said.
I love the second one - the Nyad or Dryad or whatever it is.
In the first one you needed to play around with the feathering and sharpness a bit - the figures are too stark and need to be anti-aliased better with the background. And like Dug I can't stand the show, so am biased against the subject to begin with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jodi B
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Katherine
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:06 am Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
Aaahhh yes, completely agree with all of the above - and don't panic I'm not a fan of dancing with the stars either.
My stupid day job & slave driving boss has been getting in the way lately and my mountain of creative ideas is getting out of hand so I've been escaping reality for an hour or so once the kids are tucked up in bed. Sooooo... I'm thinking if I get them to a reasonable stage now I can come back when I have more time and work on the ones that I still like.
I'd like to make a tree using people to form the trunk and branches but might have bride a few of my fit looking friends to pose semi naked - |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dug
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 4837
Location: Gippsland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
| Jodi B wrote: |
I'd like to make a tree using people to form the trunk and branches but might have bride a few of my fit looking friends to pose semi naked -  |
I could pose as a boab tree |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jodi B
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Katherine
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:46 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
Wow thanks Dug, sounds great - just post a few happy snaps here and leave the rest up to me
Would you prefer with or without leaves? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dug
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 4837
Location: Gippsland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:19 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
The branches at the top of the tree have been bare for a long time now |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sunfire
Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 1430
Location: Toodyay
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:25 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
They're all great Jodi, but I do think the third one is gorgeous.
your lucky to have such cute models. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jodi B
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Katherine
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
I've added a little bit more detail to this one and softener her up up tad but I'm struggling with the shadow because in my eyes the directions of light is almost front on so the shadow will fall straight behind right / slightly to the left? I have darkened the back of her dress a smidge too. I've also adjusted her wings but still not sure if they look like they're on the right angle.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dug
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 4837
Location: Gippsland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:32 pm Post subject: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
AAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH A giant mutant butterfly has taken a small child and is forcing her to collect pollen !
My nightmares are coming true !
Sorry
Last night I was dreaming that our car crashed into a giant tub of coleslaw that was sitting in the middle of the road |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Devilbiss
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 3213
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:30 pm Post subject: Re: Re - photomanipulation |
|
|
| Dug wrote: |
Sorry
Last night I was dreaming that our car crashed into a giant tub of coleslaw that was sitting in the middle of the road  |
Oh well that's alright, that explains everything then.
It wasn't from KFC was it?
I hate coleslaw and I doubly hate KFC coleslaw.
Looks like you're having fun Jodi...I bet you're daughter loves them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|